If You See a Painted Purple Fence, This Is What It Means

Understanding purple paint laws can serve as a vital guidepost for navigating unfamiliar terrain, whether you’re behind the wheel or trekking through the wilderness.

As the summer season beckons, drawing many outdoors for adventures and exploration, it’s prudent to arm oneself with knowledge of local regulations. After all, a little precaution can go a long way in ensuring safety.

Amidst the landscape of fences and foliage, keep a keen eye out for the telltale hue of purple, a subtle yet significant indicator of boundary lines and restrictions.

So, what does a splash of purple signify? In many states, a purple fence serves as a clear message: no trespassing allowed. While traditional “No Trespassing” signs may fade or fall victim to wear and tear, a coat of enduring purple paint stands as a steadfast deterrent.

But purple markers aren’t confined to fences alone; trees adorned with this distinctive hue also serve as boundary demarcations, ensuring clarity even for those with color-blindness.

If you find yourself contemplating the application of purple paint to your property, it’s prudent to acquaint yourself with local ordinances, as not all states recognize purple as a legal marker. However, for those jurisdictions where it holds sway, adhering to specific guidelines is essential.

When applying purple paint to fences, ensure the stripes are vertical, at least an inch wide, and extend eight inches in length. Maintain consistency by spacing the marks three to five feet from the ground and no more than 100 feet apart. Opt for durable latex or spray paint for trees, ensuring visibility and accuracy in marking boundaries.

Whether navigating urban streets or meandering through remote trails, remember to prioritize safety and vigilance. With a mindful eye and an understanding of purple paint laws, you can tread confidently, knowing you’re on the right path.

‘Relationship Expert’ Wants Parents To Get Baby’s Consent Before Changing A Nappy

If there is one thing we are certain of in life, it’s the fact that people have an opinion. Some will even try to voice that opinion as loud as possible, despite the fact that very few people are listening.

The Internet really makes it easy for anyone to have such an opinion and to voice it for the world to hear. The funny thing is that the stranger the opinion, the more press it seems to receive.

That is what one expert is now experiencing, thanks to their unusual recommendation for parents. They are a self-proclaimed relationship expert, and they said that parents should ask for permission before changing a diaper.

We realize that there are a lot of issues revolving around consent these days, and it can be difficult to navigate them. As far as many parents are concerned, however, asking a baby’s permission before changing a dirty diaper is just out of the question.

To be honest, most parents are not very happy about the fact that they have to change diapers but it is a necessity if you are going to raise your children happy and healthy. Adding the extra layer of having to ask permission before doing so is above and beyond.

The woman who made this claim says that she is a ‘sexuality educator, speaker, and author.’ Her name is Deanne Carson and her unusual recommendation for parents is making waves.

She was on ABC in 2018 to share these insights. She said that this is typically done with children above the age of three but she also feels that consent is important to introduce at a much younger age.

She does admit that babies will not be able to verbally respond to the request for consent, but they should be able to give nonverbal communication with eye contact and in other forms.

She claims that it’s about setting up a culture of consent in the home, and asking if it is okay to change the nappy before doing so.

Carson went further to explain the process, saying that allowing a moment for anticipation and waiting for any nonverbal cues can help parents and toddlers communicate on a deeper level.

Perhaps the most interesting thing was the way the reporters reacted to the suggestion. Not only were they very verbal, but they were also wondering what would happen if the baby said no.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*