Warning: This article contains images of a dead animal some readers may find distressing.
A Masterchef contestant was immediately removed from the show after serving up the judges a questionable dish that had them spitting feathers – literally.
Oh, Masterchef.
There’s nothing better than watching over confident contestants talk themselves up on the VT – only to have them produce an absolute abomination of the dish that the judges’ waste no time in ripping into.
We all like to sit on our sofas, Goggleboxing and declaring that we could do better.
Although this time, most of us probably could because anything would be better than what one contestant served up on Masterchef Espãna.
Saray Carrillo served up a questionable dish. (Masterchef Espana / YouTube)
Sometimes when you’re cooking, not every job is pleasant, and if you want to serve up something that looks delicious and inviting, sometimes you have to get a little bit dirty.
And that’s something this contestant had no plans of doing.
In 2020, Saray Carrillo, 27, was mortified by one of the challenges where she had to pluck and cook a whole partridge.
Unless you’re vegan or vegetarian, cutting up poultry is pretty standard cooking practice, but Carrillo apparently expressed her fear of having to do such a task and took the challenge as a personal attack.
Defiantly, she decided to serve the bird, unplucked, uncooked and unappetising, garnished on a bed of spring onions, some kind of sauce and garnished with a couple of cherry tomatoes.
Take a look:
Umm, yeah. (Masterchef Espana / YouTube)
I think it’s hilarious, but the judges certainly didn’t think so – the only way to describe the look on their faces is ‘p*ssed’.
This was only exasperated more when Carrillo approached the bench with a cheeky smirk on her face, whilst the rest of the contestants looked on in horror by the dish she was presenting.
One judge said something in Spanish that translated to: “This is never seen in MasterChef.”
The judges, rightly so, grilled Carrillo and were not exactly sad to see the back of her.
As she plonked her apron down on the bench and strutted out of the Masterchef kitchen, the judges watched her leave with faces like a slapped a**.
The clip was from a season that aired in 2020 and went viral at the time, and has since been viewed 7.4 million times on YouTube.Play
People were quick to mock the episode on social media.
One YouTube user wrote: “HOW DISGUSTING GOD, I really can’t handle cherry tomatoes.”
Someone else saw fit to quote TV Chef legend Gordon Ramsay saying: “IT’S SO RAW THAT IT CAN STILL FLY!”
While another brutally said: “It is tragic that a person like this is a social educator when in reality she is yet to be civilized.”
I wonder what John and Greg would have made of all this?
Archaeologists Believe They Have Found Noah’s Ark
One of the longest-standing questions in biblical archaeology is the whereabouts of Noah’s Ark’s remnants. A massive wooden vessel known as Noah’s Ark, according to the Bible, protected Noah, his family, and pairs of every animal species from a devastating deluge that inundated the Earth approximately 5,000 years ago. Even while this myth has long been central to many theological ideologies, it has been difficult to use scientific evidence to support its historicity. Archaeologists believe they are now one step closer to confirming the resting place of Noah’s Ark, but recent discoveries have given new life to this ancient search.
This archaeological study has its core in Turkey, more precisely in the Doğubayazıt area of Ağrı, where a mysterious geological structure that resembles a boat-shaped mound has been studied since 1956. This location is consistent with the biblical story that the Ark landed on the “mountains of Ararat” in Turkey after a 150-day flood wiped out all life on Earth. With its impressive 16,500 feet of elevation, the mountain itself is shaped like an ark.
A group of specialists from Istanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Andrew University, and Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (AİÇÜ) headed the expedition, which started in 2021 and is still going strong. The main objective of the research is to examine soil and rock samples taken from the location in an effort to find solid proof that could support the presence of Noah’s Ark.
The team took thirty samples of rock and soil fragments from the location in December 2022, and the samples were examined at the ITU laboratory. Researchers are really excited by the preliminary findings. The samples included residues of seafood along with clayey and marine elements. The findings, researchers say, clearly point to human activity at the boat-shaped mound between 3000 and 5500 BC.
Because it closely corresponds with the biblical timeline of the Great Flood, which occurred approximately 5,000 years ago, dating human activity to this era is extremely significant. To be sure that Noah’s Ark is present at this location, further thorough investigation and study are nevertheless required, according to the researchers, who are nevertheless wary.
In response to the results, AİÇÜ Vice Rector Professor Faruk Kaya said, “The initial results of the investigations indicate that human activity has been in the area since the Chalcolithic era, which occurred between 5500 and 3000 BC. We know that Prophet Noah’s flood occurred 5,000 years ago. It is also said that there was life in this area when it comes to dating. The outcomes of the lab tests demonstrated this. With the dating, it is impossible to claim that the ship is here. To make this clear, we must work for a very long time.
Although these results are fascinating, it’s important to remember that they don’t offer solid proof of Noah’s Ark’s presence. Recognizing that there is skepticism surrounding this quest, the experts on the expedition are dedicated to carrying out rigorous and exhaustive scientific examinations in order to completely validate their findings.
The geological past of Mount Ararat is one area of disagreement in the discussion of the Ark’s location. Young Earth creationist Dr. Andrew Snelling, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Sydney, has contended that Mount Ararat cannot be the location of the Ark because the mountain formed after the floodwaters subsided. The complexity of the Noah’s Ark story and the variety of viewpoints that surround it are shown by this divergence in interpretation.
Finding Noah’s Ark is still a difficult and controversial task in the field of biblical archaeology. Some view the story skeptically, focusing on the symbolic and metaphorical elements found in religious scriptures, while others continue to ponder the alluring prospect of finding one of history’s most famous boats.
The search to verify the presence of Noah’s Ark is evidence of humanity’s never-ending curiosity with solving the secrets of our history, regardless of the conclusion of this continuous archaeological inquiry. It serves as a reminder that, despite obstacles posed by science, the quest for knowledge and comprehension is nonetheless fundamental to the human experience.
In conclusion, we are getting closer to maybe verifying the presence of Noah’s Ark thanks to the archeological dig in Turkey. By analyzing soil and rock samples, scientists have found evidence of human habitation from a time closely linked to the biblical story of the Great Flood. To be clear, more research is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Noah’s Ark was present at this location. Nevertheless, it is imperative to embrace these discoveries with cautious hope. No matter what happens, this search is a prime example of how humans have always been fascinated by solving old mysteries and examining the nexus between faith, history, and science.
Leave a Reply