After demonstrating that the “Blackface” photo was an acne mask, teens who were expelled for it were awarded $1 million.
A miscommunication at Mountain View, California’s Saint Francis High School resulted in the expulsion of a few pupils in 2017. Since the school thought these children had worn blackface, there were severe repercussions right away. It was eventually discovered, though, that the pupils were only using an acne treatment mask. The kids have received a $1 million compensation as a result of this realization, which has caused a significant turn in the events.
Trouble Resulted from Blackface
A picture of three 14-year-old boys from the school went viral online and sparked uproar, which sparked the start of the trouble. The boys were charged with making fun of a terrible period in American history. It was quickly ascertained, although, that this was a misunderstanding. The boys were only helping a friend who was using a skincare mask to treat his acne.
Highlighted was Saint Francis High School, which is renowned for its rigorous academic standards and dedication to student growth. Although the contentious image was uploaded in 2017, it wasn’t until 2020—during a time of increased sensitivity to racial issues—that it came to light.
Gaining Notoriety During Debate
In 2020, the year of the COVID-19 epidemic and major social turmoil, the photo went viral. Since it seemed to depict the students in blackface, they were expelled right away. The boys encountered strong criticism from their community; their identities have been withheld for their security.
The lads said that the reason for their faces’ dark color was an acne mask that begins green and becomes darker as it dries. The miscommunication caused by the photo’s brightness further led to the boys being falsely accused by school officials.
Blackface Myths
After reviewing the case this week, the Santa Clara County Court concluded that the boys had been unfairly charged. The lads were expelled without having received the requisite due process, the court found. This means that every student will get $500,000 in addition to their $70,000 tuition being paid back. “This case is significant not only for our clients but for its groundbreaking effect on all private high schools in California,” said Krista Baughman, one of the teen’s attorneys. The unfairness of Saint Francis High School’s practices was duly confirmed by the jury.
The lads initially accused the school of defamation and breaching their right to free speech, and they launched a lawsuit seeking $20 million. Even though they didn’t get the entire sum, their families and legal team view the settlement as a win.
Saint Francis High School has stated that it disagrees with the court’s ruling and is thinking about all of its legal options, including filing an appeal. “We want to sincerely thank the jury and the court system for helping our boys and our families find justice and clear their names,” said a statement from one of the boys’ families.
Amazing Skincare
The mislabeled mask was actually a part of an Origins skincare collection. Origins, a well-known brand in skincare thanks to its natural approach, has been around since the 1980s and offers a variety of products that address everything from oil control to face brightening. Due to its dedication to using only plant-based components, the brand is well-known all over the world.
Given the racial tensions that exist in the nation today, it is not shocking that a picture that seems to depict blackface would be misinterpreted. Dark-colored substances like charcoal have gained popularity in cosmetic goods like acne masks and toothpaste that whitens teeth. Particularly in the beauty sector, these goods are here to stay.
Mom discovers a video of herself breastfeeding shared by a stranger online, her reaction is genius
Breastfeeding is a natural part of motherhood, and many mothers find themselves feeding their babies in public when the need arises. One young mother experienced this firsthand, but she had no idea that someone was secretly filming her during this intimate moment. When she discovered the footage, she had plenty to say about it. Read on to find out more…
Izabele Lomax, a woman from Maryland, was going about her day on social media when she stumbled upon a video that made her heart drop. Upon closer inspection, she realized it featured her breastfeeding in public.
The clip she encountered was a screenshot of a prior post. A stranger had recorded Lomax nursing her baby and criticized her for not covering up while doing so. The post, shared in a breastfeeding support group, included a caption expressing disbelief that another woman would take a video of a mother feeding her child and post it online.
Lomax felt a strong connection to the post, as it showed her in a vulnerable moment. “I was like:, ‘That’s me!”” she recalled, shocked to learn she had been filmed without her consent while enjoying a day at the beach.
The person who posted the video claimed they weren’t trying to shame breastfeeding mothers but rather criticized Lomax for not being more discreet. They expressed discomfort at the idea of exposing their son to topless women in public spaces.
In the video, Lomax was shown sitting under an umbrella at the beach, nursing her infant without realizing she was being recorded. The carefree day she had shared with her fiancé, baby, and parents took a turn for the worse when someone decided to judge her actions.
Not one to remain silent, Lomax took to social media to address the situation directly. In her video response, she pointed out that the woman had walked by her several times and could have chosen to speak to her instead of filming her without her knowledge.
Lomax emphasized that she would not have stopped breastfeeding her child, and she questioned why the woman felt the need to sexualize breastfeeding in front of her own young son. “If you have time to record me and post about it on Facebook, you could have taken a moment to educate your son about breastfeeding”, she said in her impassioned response.
Support for Lomax poured in from her followers, leading the original poster to delete the video. Many commenters expressed disbelief at the woman’s decision to publicly shame another mother for breastfeeding. One commenter remarked: “Who does this lady think needs protection? Just explain to your kid that the woman is feeding her baby, and move on”.
Others noted that the baby’s head covered any nudity that might have been visible, reinforcing the idea that there was nothing inappropriate about the situation. This incident sparked a significant discussion, highlighting the strong opinions surrounding public breastfeeding. What are your thoughts on this situation? Share your comments!
Leave a Reply