The “Believe” singer also addressed her anxieties about what the future for trans people will look likе in an interview with ‘The Guardian’Cher might not be “strong enough” to survive another Trump presidency.
In an interview with The Guardian released Wednesday, the “Believe” singer opened up about how “horrified” she’d feel if former President Donald Trump was once again re-elected.
“I almost got an ulcer the last time,” she told the outlet. “If he gets in, who knows? This time I will leave [the country].”The actress/musician is particularly concerned with what the future for trans people looks likе. It’s something likе 500 bills they’re trying to pass,” she told the publication. “I was with two trans girls the other night – and of course my own child [Chaz is trans]. I was saying ‘We’ve got to stand together.’ I don’t know what their eventual plan is for trans people.
I don’t put anything past them.”
Cher has been a longtime critic of the 45th president calling him a “f—ing traitor” on X (formerly known as Twitter) in 2016 and saying in a 2018 interview with The Washington Post that he had done “so much damage” to America.
The pop legend, whose birth father was Armenian, also addressed the tensions between Armenians and Azerbaijan in her conversation with The Guardian, which she has been tweeting about lately as well. She began to identify strongly with her heritage once she took a trip years ago when she visited its capital, Yerevan.
“When I got there, I thought, ‘Wow, everybody looks likе me! How could I not have strong feelings about this?’” she told the publication. The album is a 13-track project, which features collaborations with pals including Stevie Wonder and Cyndi Lauper, covers of classics likе Chuck Berry’s “Run Rudolph Run” and original tracks such as the dance-pop single “DJ Play a Christmas Song.”
I Thought I Taught My MIL a Lesson, but She Outsmarted Me After ‘Forgetting’ Her Wallet for Restaurant Dinner
Both Miranda’s predicament with Lilian, her mother-in-law, and Julia’s encounter with her in-laws serve as reminders of the complexity of family dynamics, especially when it comes to money. In Miranda’s instance, her discussion with Lilian finally resulted in a greater comprehension of one another’s viewpoints and a decision to speak more candidly going forward. Conversely, Julia and her spouse, David, managed to confront their in-laws’ shrewd actions by setting limits and promoting joint accountability.
Had I been Miranda, I might have approached the recurrent problem with Lilian in a similar manner. Establishing clear limits and having open and honest communication can frequently improve understanding within the family. It’s critical to approach these discussions with empathy and a readiness to hear one another out.
In Julia’s case, taking proactive action included confronting her in-laws about their actions and setting clear limits. Through a straightforward approach and a focus on the significance of shared responsibility, Julia and David successfully established a more equitable dynamic within their family.
In the end, every family dynamic is different, and these kinds of problems don’t have a universal answer. Nonetheless, handling challenging circumstances with family members can be greatly aided by preserving open communication, establishing limits, and placing a high value on mutual respect.
Leave a Reply